Table 1.
Study | Year | Modality | n | Age | Males (n) | n | Age | Males (n) | Condition | Reported Graph- Analytical Measures | Statistical Dependency Measure | Connectivity Matrix | Thresholding |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Micheloyannis et al62 | 2006 | EEG | 20 | 32.4 | 15 | 20 | 27.4 | 15 | Rest | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length | Synchronization likelihood | Binary | Absolute |
Rubinov et al63 | 2009 | EEG | 40 | 19.6 | 26 | 40 | 19.7 | 26 | Rest | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length | Nonlinear interdependence | Weighted | Relative (10%–20%) |
Fogelson et al64 | 2013 | EEG | 20 | 35.5 | 18 | 20 | 36.2 | 18 | Task | Minimal path length | Synchronization likelihood | Binary | Relative (8%–15%) |
Jhung et al61 | 2013 | EEG | 23 | 19.6 | 5 | 13 | 20.2 | 5 | Task & rest | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length, small-worldness | Synchronization likelihood | Binary | Relative |
Shim et al43 | 2014 | EEG | 34 | 33.9 | 14 | 34 | 34.7 | 20 | Task | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length | Phase locking value | Weighted | None |
Lynall et al34 | 2010 | fMRI | 12 | 10.0 | 33 | 15 | 14.0 | 33 | Rest | Average clustering, small-worldness, global efficiency | Wavelet correlation | Binary | Relative (37%–50%) |
Alexander-Bloch et al35 | 2010 | fMRI | 13 | 18.0 | 5 | 19 | 19.0 | 9 | Rest | Clustering coefficient, global efficiency, local efficiency | Wavelet correlation | Binary | Relative (30%–50%) |
Yu et al60 | 2011 | fMRI | 19 | 36.5 | 15 | 19 | 33.9 | 9 | Rest | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length, global efficiency, local efficiency | Partial correlation, z-transformed | Binary | Relative (35%–43%) |
Fornito et al38 | 2011 | fMRI | 23 | 20.5 | 14 | 25 | 22.1 | 13 | Task | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length, small-worldness, global efficiency, local efficiendy | Beta series correlation | Binary | Relative (5%–45%) |
Ma et al58 | 2012 | fMRI | 28 | 37.8 | 23 | 28 | 32.7 | 19 | Task & rest | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length | Normalized mutual information | Binary | Absolute |
He et al59 | 2012 | fMRI | 35 | 34.3 | 26 | 35 | 34.6 | 27 | Task | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length, global efficiency, local efficiency | Partial correlation, z-transformed | Binary | Relative (19%–34%) |
Alexander-Bloch et al37 | 2013 | fMRI | 19 | 18.7 | 9 | 20 | 19.4 | 10 | Rest | Clustering coefficient, small-worldness | Wavelet correlation | Binary | Relative (1%–10%) |
Tomasi et al36 | 2014 | fMRI | 69 | 38.0 | 55 | 74 | 36.0 | 51 | Rest | Clustering coefficient, minimal path length, small-worldness | Correlation | Binary | Relative (40%–65%) |
Note: EEG, electroencephalography; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging.