Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;145(8):949–965. doi: 10.1037/xge0000180

Figure 3.

Figure 3

In all panels, “Individual overall” refers to measures taken during the first part of each trial, when individuals made private decisions. The term overall refers to the fact that trials were not split according to social consensus. “Dyadic dis/agree” refers to measures taken in the second part of each trial by both individuals jointly. These measures are split and presented according to consensus. (A) Relationship between changes in wager size and accuracy at the individual (middle bars) and dyadic level (left and right bars) in Standard trials. After interaction, wagers increase or decrease according to social consensus. The magnitude of the change reflects the magnitude of change in the expected correct response rates. (B) Same data as in panel A left, but for Conflict and Null trials. Average wager size across Conflict and Null conditions, different decision types (individual vs. dyadic) and divided by consensus. As in panel A, individual wagers are represented by the middle bar, whereas dyadic wagers are represented by the left and right bars and divided by consensus. (C) Social versus perceptual effect on dyadic wager size (left) and wager change from baseline (right).