Skip to main content
. 2016 May;9(1):70–78. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2016.9.1.70

Table 2.

Effect of hAFSCs on renal tissue oxidative stress parameters (n=20/group)

Group I
negative control
Group II
cisplatin-treated
Group III
cisplatin+hAFSCs-treated
Group VI
Cisplatin+DMEM culture media treated
MDA (nmol/g tissue) Day 4 14.6±1.61 66.5±2.83* 34.7±6.72* 66.6±2.68*,#
Day 7 14.9±1.50 64.9±3.93*,‡ 26.1±2.13*,§,‡ 66.9±2.29*,#
Day 11 15.4±1.63 35.5±3.33*,‡,† 17.8±1.78§,‡,† 34.8±2.84*,#,‡,†
Day 30 15.1±1.62 30.1±4.61*,‡,† 17.6±2.29§,‡,† 28.1±1.58*,#,‡,†,•
GSH (mmol/g tissue) Day 4 5.40±0.25 0.26±0.03* 0.76±0.02* 0.26±0.02*,#
Day 7 5.44±0.23 0.54±0.03*,‡ 2.64±0.36*,§,‡ 0.52±0.03*,#,‡
Day 11 5.55±0.17 1.49±0.33*,‡,† 3.55±0.15*,§,‡,† 1.32±0.30*,#,‡,†
Day 30 5.32±0.31 1.92±0.03*,‡,† 3.98±0.43*,§,‡,† 1.91±0.05*,#,‡,†,•
SOD (U/g tissue) Day 4 20.36±1.70 2.98±0.19* 6.93±0.42* 2.94±0.23*,#
Day 7 19.92±1.39 6.24±0.42*,‡ 10.69±0.33*,§,‡ 6.22±0.45*,#,‡
Day 11 19.88±1.40 9.98±0.32*,‡,† 15.73±0.29*,§,‡,† 10.0±0.25*,#,‡,†
Day 30 20.22±1.70 15.3±0.36*,‡,†,• 18.74±0.15§,‡,†,• 15.6±0.49*,#,‡,†,•

Significant difference compared to corresponding *control, §cisplatin group and #cisplatin+hAFSCs group.

Significant difference compared to intragroup day 4, day 7, day 11 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by posthoc multiple comparisons (Scheffé test) at p≤0.05.