Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2015 May 15;44(9):1752–1766. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0295-z

Table 3.

Correlations, means and standard deviation (SD) for main variables. These figures are based on the scales’ sum scores for cases with complete information on all measures (N = 976) and were calculated in Stata 11.

1.AUDIT19 2.SMFQ14 3.Peers18 4.Peers13§ 5.SDQ 6.Alcohol13 7.Knowledge 8.Disclose 9.Solicit 10.Control

1 1.00
2 0.11** 1.00
3 0.39** 0.12** 1.00
4 0.17* 0.16** 0.21** 1.00
5 -0.02ns 0.11** -0.04ns 0.07* 1.00
6 0.18** 0.17** 0.13** 0.32** -0.01ns 1
7 -0.27** -0.29** -0.25** -0.26** -0.01ns -0.24** 1.00
8 -0.29** -0.29** -0.28** -0.24** -0.03ns -0.25** 0.71** 1.00
9 -0.04ns -0.10* -0.09* -0.13** 0.01ns -0.13** 0.42** 0.41** 1.00
10 -0.17** -0.03ns -0.19** -0.20** 0.02ns -0.19** 0.48** 0.38** 0.44** 1.00

Mea 9.2 4.9 2.2 0.8 2.2 -0.003 28.1 13.5 13.7 14.2
SD 5.4 4.5 1.5 1.1 0.8 1.1 5.8 3.4 2.8 3.6

Note:

ns = not significant, *p < .05, **p<.001

ȣ

main variables in our model

§

confounder variables used to adjust our model

¥

scales of the monitoring questionnaire

#

Following the approach followed by Saraceno and colleagues (2010), harmful drinking at age 13 was constructed using a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) approach. PCA extrapolates components with mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1

AUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test

SMFQ: Short Mood and Feeling Questionnaire

SDQ: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire – conduct problem subscale