. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 26.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2015 May 15;44(9):1752–1766. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0295-z

Table 6.

Imputed data: Multiple group comparisons of the strength of the indirect effect via peers at age 18 between adolescents who reported low vs. high parental monitoring. All analyses are adjusted for background variables, SDQ conduct problems, alcohol use and deviant peers at age 13

	Monitoring		Disclosure		Soliciting		Control

	Estimate (se)	Wald	Estimate (se)	Wald	Estimate (se)	Wald	Estimate (se)	Wald

Path a
Low	.08 (.01, .16)	0.3,p=.98	.07 (-.07, .21)	-0.5,p=.64	.10 (.01, .20)	0.3, p= .79	.13 (.05, .21)	1.2, p = .22
High	.07 (.01, .15)	0.3,p=.98	.10 (.01, .20)		.09 (.01, .19)		.06 (-.02, .14)

Path b
Low	.42 (.28, .56)	1.9, p=.06	.39 (.25, .53)	0.8, p=.45	.44 (.30, .58)	2.8,p=.005	.46 (.32, .60)	2.4,p =.006
High	.26 (.12, .40)		.33 (.19, .47)		.23 (.11, .35)		.23 (.11, .35)