Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2016 May 12;130(4):357–375. doi: 10.1037/bne0000149

Table 1.

Outline of behavioral training procedures

Experiment 1
Group Element training Compound Test
Over (no Vis) A→food, B→nothing, C→food AC→food A? B? C? V?
Over (Vis) A→food, B→nothing, C→food VAC→food A? B? C? V?
CTL (no Vis) A→food, B→nothing, C→food BC→food A? B? C? V?
CTL (Vis) A→food, B→nothing, C→food VBC→food A? B? C? V?
Experiment 2
Group Compound training Summation test Retardation test
Over VAC→food, A→food, B→no food, C→food A, VA, C, VC,
B, VB, V, VAC, VBC
V→food
CTL VBC→food, A→food, B→no food, C→food A, VA, C, VC,
B, VB, V, VAC, VBC
V→food

Over = Overexpectation treatment; CTL = control treatment; Vis and no Vis refer to the presence or absence of a visual cue (V) in the compound training phase. A and B were a tone or a noise (counterbalanced) and C was a clicker. Rats with excitotoxic or sham lesions of central or basolateral amygdala were equally represented in each training condition (group).

Over = Overexpectation treatment; CTL = control treatment; A and B were a tone or a noise (counterbalanced), C was a clicker, and V was a visual conditioned stimulus. All CS element and compound presentations in the summation test were nonreinforced. Rats with excitotoxic or sham lesions of central or basolateral amygdala were equally represented in each group.