Table 1.
Experiment 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Group | Element training | Compound | Test |
Over (no Vis) | A→food, B→nothing, C→food | AC→food | A? B? C? V? |
Over (Vis) | A→food, B→nothing, C→food | VAC→food | A? B? C? V? |
CTL (no Vis) | A→food, B→nothing, C→food | BC→food | A? B? C? V? |
CTL (Vis) | A→food, B→nothing, C→food | VBC→food | A? B? C? V? |
Experiment 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Group | Compound training | Summation test | Retardation test |
Over | VAC→food, A→food, B→no food, C→food | A, VA, C, VC, B, VB, V, VAC, VBC |
V→food |
CTL | VBC→food, A→food, B→no food, C→food | A, VA, C, VC, B, VB, V, VAC, VBC |
V→food |
Over = Overexpectation treatment; CTL = control treatment; Vis and no Vis refer to the presence or absence of a visual cue (V) in the compound training phase. A and B were a tone or a noise (counterbalanced) and C was a clicker. Rats with excitotoxic or sham lesions of central or basolateral amygdala were equally represented in each training condition (group).
Over = Overexpectation treatment; CTL = control treatment; A and B were a tone or a noise (counterbalanced), C was a clicker, and V was a visual conditioned stimulus. All CS element and compound presentations in the summation test were nonreinforced. Rats with excitotoxic or sham lesions of central or basolateral amygdala were equally represented in each group.