Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2016 May 12;130(4):357–375. doi: 10.1037/bne0000149

Table 4.

Mean (± s.e.m.) responding during the lever-alone test in Experiment 3.

rats n lever-press
rate
lever-press
probability
food-cup
% time pre
food-cup
% time dur
all sham 20 33.5 ± 2.9 88.1 ± 5.0 0.8 ± 0.3 4.2 ± 1.7
all CeA 20 33.2 ± 2.7 91.9 ± 4.6 1.5 ± 0.5 5.7 ± 1.5
all BLA 18 22.1 ± 2.9 73.6 ± 6.3 2.3 ± 1.4 6.0 ± 1.8
GT sham 1 0.0 0.0 2.6 30.4
GT CeA 1 0.4 12.5 9.6 28.7
GT BLA 5 8.3 ± 3.1 35.0 ± 8.3 0.0 ± 0.0 8.8 ± 4.0
ST BLA 13 27.5 ± 2.7 88.4 ± 3.0 3.2 ± 1.9 4.9 ± 1.9

The left two data columns show lever-presses/min and the percentage of trials with a lever-press, respectively. The right two data columns show the percentage of time spent in the food cup in the 10-s periods prior to (pre) and during (dur) lever presentations. CeA = rats with lesions of the amygdala central nucleus; BLA = rats with lesions of the basolateral amygdala; GT = goal-trackers; ST = sign-trackers.