Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2016 Jul 27;36(30):7841–7851. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0439-16.2016

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2016 Lawrenson et al.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 4. — Changes in evoked CFPs are not related to simultaneously evoked muscle reflex. A, Representative case (animal GRA) plotting for the three phases of rearing average size of CFP (bars) and EMG (dashed line) evoked by the same ipsilateral hindlimb stimulation (mean ± SEM in both plots). The phase-related variations in mean size of evoked CFPs were statistically significant (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001, F_(2,112) = 13.41; Tukey's multiple comparisons test: phase 1 vs phase 2, p < 0.01 and phase 2 vs phase 3, p < 0.001). In contrast, the mean size of evoked EMG responses were not significantly different (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.877, F_(2,112) = 13.19). B, Pooled data from six animals showing mean size of evoked EMG response relative to the three phases of rearing (mean ± SEM, one-way ANOVA, p = 0.971, F_(2,15) = 0.0298). C, Scatter plots for one example case (animal GRA), showing trial-by-trial fluctuations in evoked CFP and EMG for the three phases of rearing (Pearson's correlation; phase 1, r = 0.156, p = 0.58; phase 2, r = −0.065, p = 0.59; phase 3, r = −0.113, p = 0.55).