Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 29;5(7):62. doi: 10.3390/jcm5070062

Table 2.

Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Clinical Trials for HF.

Clinical Trial Name Drug Class Drugs Condition Phase No. of Patients Date Outcome References
CONSENSUS ACE inhibitors (ACEis) Enalapril vs. placebo Severe congestive heart failure Double-blinded multi-center RCT 253 1987 ACEi improved symptoms, reduced HF progression in NYHA IV and mortality [80]
SOLVD ACE inhibitors (ACEis) Enalapril vs. placebo Heart failure with ejection fractions of 0.35 or less and on drugs other than an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor Double-blinded multi-center RCT 4228 1992 ACEi in an asymptomatic LV dysfunction reduced incidence and hospitalization for HF [81]
RALES Aldosterone antagonists Spironolactone vs. placebo CCF (NYHA III and IV) Double-blinded multi-center RCT 1663 1999 Spironolactone reduced hospitalization (35%), mortality (30%) and symptoms in NYHA III/IV [82]
CIBIS-II Beta blockers Bisoprolol vs. placebo HF (NYHA Classes III–IV) Double-blinded multi-center RCT 2647 1999 All-cause mortality hospitalizations and sudden cardiac death were reduced by 50%. [83]
ValHeFT Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) Valsartan vs. placebo Heart failure (NYHA II–IV) Multicenter, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled RCT 5010 2001 Valsartan improved symptoms and mortality in NYHA II+; no benefit when added to ACEi [84]
VMAC Recombinant form of human B-type natriuretic peptide Vs nitrates Intravenous nesiritide vs. nitroglycerin vs. placebo Acute decompensated HF Randomized, double-blind trial 489 2002 Nesiritide improved hemodynamic function as assessed by measuring reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) [85]
COMET Beta blockers Carvedilol vs. metoprolol Heart failure (EF < 35%; Stage II–IV) Multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, RCT 3029 2003 Carvedilol decreased all-cause mortality by 6% as compared to metoprolol [86]
CHARM (includes CHARM added/alternative/preserved) Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) Candesartan +/− ACEis vs. placebo Heart failure (EF < 40%; Stage II or IV); (EF < 40% on ACEi for added);
(EF < 40% intolerant of ACEi for alternative);
EF > 40% for preserved
Double-blinded multi-center RCT 4576/2448 for added/2028 for alternative/30,233 for preserved 2003 Candesartan reduced death in HF; had added benefit in the presence of ACEi irrespective of ACEis dose; no benefit in preserved LV dysfunction [87,88,89]
EVEREST Vasopressin antagonists Tolvaptan vs. placebo Decompensated HF Multi-center, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial 4133 2007 Significant benefit on dyspnea, edema, body weight and serum sodium, but no improvement in cardio-vascular mortality or HF hospitalization [90]
VERITAS Endothelin receptor antagonist Intravenous tezosentan vs. placebo Acute HF Randomized, double-blind trial 1435 2007 Tezosentan failed to improve symptoms or clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure [91]
CORONA Statin Rosuvastatin vs. placebo Congestive Cardiac Failure (CCF) (EF < 40%, NYHA II) Multicenter, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial 5011 2007 Rosuvastatin in statin-naive CCF patients reduced admissions, but not mortality [92]
ACCLAIM Device-based non-specific immuno-modulation therapy (IMT) Celecade vs. placebo NYHA II–IV HF Double-blind, placebo-controlled study 2426 2008 Failed to demonstrate reduction in hospitalization or mortality, but proposed to be beneficial for the early stages of HF [93]
SHIFT Specific inhibitor of current in the sinoatrial node Ivabradine vs. placebo HF with LVEF 35% or lower with heart rate >70 in sinus rhythm Double-blinded multi-center RCT 6558 2010 Ivabradine reduced CCF admissions and deaths, especially those with higher HR [69]
EMPHASIS-HF Aldosterone antagonists Eplerenone vs. placebo CCF (NYHA II and EF < 35%) Double-blinded multi-center RCT 2737 2011 Eplerenone reduced mortality by 7% and symptoms in NYHA II [70]
ASCEND-HF Recombinant form of human B-type natriuretic peptide Nesiritide infusion vs. placebo HF Double-blinded multi-center RCT 7141 2011 Improved the symptom of dyspnea, but no change in mortality [72]
RELAX cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor Sildenafil vs. placebo Diastolic HF with NYHA II–III
(LVEF > 50%)
Double-blinded multi-center RCT 216 2012 No improvement in health outcomes and exercise ability [94]
ASTRONAUT Renin inhibitor Aliskiren vs. placebo Decompensated HF Multicenter, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial 1639 2013 No additional benefit from the drug to standard therapy [95]
ATOMIC-AHF Cardiac-specific myosin activator Omecamtiv mecarbil vs. placebo ADHF with LVEF ≤ 40% Multicenter, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial 614 2013 Safe, but no change in the dyspnea symptoms [96]
RELAX-AHF Vasoactive peptide hormone Serelaxin, recombinant human relaxin-2 vs. placebo Acute HF Randomized, placebo-controlled trial 1161 2013 Dyspnea relief and other symptoms of HF, but had no effect on hospital readmissions [97]
PARADIGM-HF Combination of ARB, valsartan and a neprilysin inhibitor prodrug sacubitril Valsartan/sacubitril (LCZ696) vs. enalapril NYHA functional Class II–IV (HFrEF and HFpEF) Randomized study 8442 2014 Significant reductions in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, as well as heart failure hospitalization [72,98]
SOCRATES, including SOCRATES-REDUCED for LVEF ≤ 45 SOCRATES-PRESERVED for LVEF ≥ 45 Oral cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) stimulator Oral (cGMP) stimulator vericiguat (BAY 1021189) vs. placebo HF with LVEF ≥ 45 and ≤ 45 Double-blinded multi-center RCT 456 2014 Study completed, results awaited [99]
NCT01919177 Inorganic nitrates Beet root vs. placebo Heart failure with normal ejection fraction randomized, double-blind, 17 2015 Increased exercise capacity by increasing exercise vasodilatory and cardiac output reserves [3]
Defibrillator-based clinical trials
SCD-HeFT ICD vs. drug ICD vs. amiodarone vs. placebo CCF (NYHA II/III;
LVEF < 35)
Double-blinded multi-center RCT 2521 2005 ICD significantly increased survival by 23%; amiodarone had no effect [100]
MADIT-CRT CRT CRT with and without ICD HF (NYHA I–II;
EF < 30%; QRS > 130 ms)
Double-blinded multi-center RCT 1820 2009 CRT (added to ICD) slows the progression of heart failure in high-risk (QRS ≥ 130 ms, EF ≤ 3 0%), mildly symptomatic patients (NYHA I/II) [75]
PARTNERS HF HF device Combined heart failure (HF) device guided diagnostic data to predict clinical deterioration of HF CRT implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in HF patients Observational study 1024 2010 Identifies patients at a higher risk of HF hospitalizations [101]
Stem cell-based clinical trials
TOPCARE-CHD Bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells intracoronary injection of functional BMMC vs. placebo Ischemic HF Single-center study randomized 121 2007 Improved cardiac function and suppression of NT-proANP and proBNP with BMMC, especially with cells with high functional capacity determined with the colony forming unit assay [102]
SCIPIO Cardiac stem cells Intracoronary injection of in vitro expanded c-Kit+ CSC from myocardium vs. placebo Ischemic HF with LVEF < 40% Single-center study 18 2011 Significant improvement in myocardial performance, scar tissue reduction and LV systolic function [103]
TAC-HFT MSCs and BMMCs Trans-endocardial injection of culture-expanded MSCs vs. whole BMMC vs. placebo Ischemic cardio-myopathy with LVEF < 50% Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study 65 2011 MSCs and BMMC were safe, but MSCs better for scar reduction and improved myocardial function than BMMCs [104]
FOCUS-CCTRN Bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells Trans-endocardial injection of BMMC vs. placebo Ischemic HF/NYHA II–III with LVHF < 45% Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 153 2012 Failed to improve LVESV, maximal oxygen consumption or reversibility on SPECT [105]
POSEIDON Mesenchymal stem cells Allogenic vs. autologous trans-endocardial injection of MSCs Chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction with LVHF < 50% Single-center study 31 2012 Both allo- and auto-MSCs were safe, reduced infarct size and improved ventricular remodeling [106]
CADUCEUS Cardiosphere-derived cells Intracoronary administration of autologous CDCs vs. placebo Ischemic HF, NYHF I with LVEF between 25% and 45% Single-center study 17 2012 Safe and decreased scar size, increased viable myocardium and improved regional function of infarcted myocardium, but no significant improvement in EF [107]
NOGA-DCM Bone marrow-derived CD34+ cells Trans-endocardial CD34+ vs. placebo Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with NYHA III and LVHF < 40% Single-center study randomized 33 2014 Improved left ventricular function, decreased N-terminal pro-BNP and better exercise capacity with infusion of a high number of cells [108]
PROMETHEUS Mesenchymal stem cells Intra-myocardial injection of autologous MSCs Chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing CABG Single-center study 6 2014 Scar reduction, improvement in myocardial perfusion, regional function and LVEF in patients undergoing CABG [109]
CHART-1 Cardiopoietic stem cells bone marrow-derived and lineage-directed autologous cardiopoietic stem cells Ischemic HF Randomized, sham-controlled multicenter study 240 2015 Under progress [110]
Gene therapy-based clinical trials
CUPID-Phase I Gene therapy Antegrade epicardial coronary artery infusion of gene SERCA2a via an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector Advanced HF-NYHF III/IV (LVEF ≤ 30%) Single-center study 9 2008 Safe and improvement in various parameters, such as exercise tolerance, LVEF, reduction of BNP levels [78]
CUPID-Phase II Gene therapy Intracoronary adeno-associated virus type 1/sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase vs. placebo Advanced HF-NYHF III/IV (LVEF ≤ 30%) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 39 2011 Improvement in various parameters, such as exercise tolerance, LVEF, reduction of BNP levels [79]