Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Behav. 2015 Jan 7;17:69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.12.014

Table 2.

Separate linear regression models with C-BEDS-based “Risky Eating” as the dependent variable regressed on each K-PEMS motive.a

Dependent variable Risky Eatingb
β t p
Independent variable:
K-PEMS Motive:
 Social
  All participantsc 0.25 2.23 0.03*
  Female 0.12 0.78 0.44
  Male 0.40 2.40 0.02*
 Copingd
  All participants 0.33 2.72 0.008**
  Female 0.32 2.18 0.04*
  Male 0.34 1.95 0.06
 Reward Enhancement
  All participants 0.36 3.20 0.002**
  Female 0.33 2.29 0.03*
  Male 0.38 2.13 0.04*
 Conformity
  All participants 0.18 1.56 0.12
*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01 denote significant independent association with Risky Eating.

a

Each line represents a separate linear regression model with the K-PEMS motive noted, age, sex, and BMIz as independent variables. Regressions per sex category were conducted when the motive was significant with all participants included.

b

The Risky Eating variable was created from the sum of “yes” responses to C-BEDS items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 (these pertained to eating when not hungry, loss of control when eating, eating because of negative feelings, eating as a reward, sneaking or hiding food, and getting rid of the food, respectively).

c

All participants N = 73; female N = 38; male N = 35.

d

C-BEDS item #3 was omitted from the “Risky Eating” dependent variable due to a high correlation between this item and the Coping motive (r = 0.44, p < 0.01).