Table 2.
Dependent variable | Risky Eatingb
|
||
---|---|---|---|
β | t | p | |
Independent variable: | |||
K-PEMS Motive: | |||
Social | |||
All participantsc | 0.25 | 2.23 | 0.03* |
Female | 0.12 | 0.78 | 0.44 |
Male | 0.40 | 2.40 | 0.02* |
Copingd | |||
All participants | 0.33 | 2.72 | 0.008** |
Female | 0.32 | 2.18 | 0.04* |
Male | 0.34 | 1.95 | 0.06 |
Reward Enhancement | |||
All participants | 0.36 | 3.20 | 0.002** |
Female | 0.33 | 2.29 | 0.03* |
Male | 0.38 | 2.13 | 0.04* |
Conformity | |||
All participants | 0.18 | 1.56 | 0.12 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01 denote significant independent association with Risky Eating.
Each line represents a separate linear regression model with the K-PEMS motive noted, age, sex, and BMIz as independent variables. Regressions per sex category were conducted when the motive was significant with all participants included.
The Risky Eating variable was created from the sum of “yes” responses to C-BEDS items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 (these pertained to eating when not hungry, loss of control when eating, eating because of negative feelings, eating as a reward, sneaking or hiding food, and getting rid of the food, respectively).
All participants N = 73; female N = 38; male N = 35.
C-BEDS item #3 was omitted from the “Risky Eating” dependent variable due to a high correlation between this item and the Coping motive (r = 0.44, p < 0.01).