Table 4. Comparison of the mean probability of participation in a syphilis PN program (range 0–1) between infected patient and sex partner of the infected patient participant groups by levels of independent variables.
Independent variable | If the respondent was the infected patient | If the respondent was the sex partner of the infected patient | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | ± SD | Mean | ± SD | |
PN referral method | ||||
Patient referral | 0.6411 | 0.3113 | 0.6566 | 0.3068 |
Anonymous health care worker | 0.6339 | 0.3276 | 0.6110 | 0.3440 |
Anonymous CBO | 0.6594 | 0.3345 | 0.6378 | 0.3302 |
Contact method | ||||
Short message service | 0.6760 | 0.3049 | 0.6554 | 0.3184 |
0.6494 | 0.3269 | 0.6479 | 0.3274 | |
Instant message | 0.6322 | 0.3373 | 0.6267 | 0.3314 |
Phone call | 0.6238 | 0.3296 | 0.6096 | 0.3345 |
Face-to-face | 0.6358 | 0.3075 | 0.6580 | 0.3049 |
Partner follow-up location | ||||
Public STD clinic | 0.6928 | 0.2997 | 0.6638 | 0.3117 |
Private clinic | 0.5573 | 0.3542 | 0.5527 | 0.3479 |
MSM CBO | 0.6276 | 0.3345 | 0.6505 | 0.3269 |
Local CDCa | 0.6997 | 0.2833 | 0.6787 | 0.3040 |
aCenter for Disease Control and Prevention