Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 20;158:463–469. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3897-6

Table 1.

Association between the PRS and breast cancer risk in case–control and breast cancer family datasets

Sample group N PRS p value
OR [95 % CI]
Case–control dataset Healthy population controls 1269 Reference
All BC cases 1689 1.56 [1.45–1.68] 9.2E−31
Unselected breast cancer cases 1299 1.49 [1.38–1.62] 3.5E−23
Sporadic breast cancer cases 1020 1.41 [1.30–1.54] 5.1E−16
Index cases from small families 334 1.85 [1.63–2.11] 8.8E−21
Index cases from large families 305 1.81 [1.59–2.06] 2.0E−19
52 breast cancer families Affected family members 181 1.82 [1.55–2.13] 1.8E−13
Affected family members with no affected first-degree relatives 50 1.62 [1.22–2.14] 7.7E−4
Affected family members with one affected first-degree relative 58 1.97 [1.52–2.57] 4.0E−7
Affected family members with two affected first-degree relatives 47 1.74 [1.30–2.33] 1.8E−4
Affected family members with three or more affected first-degree relatives 26 2.05 [1.40–3.02] 2.5E−4
Healthy family members (52 breast cancer families) vs. healthy population controlsa 246 vs. 1269 1.29 [1.12–1.48] 3.4E−4

aTest for association between PRS and positive family history of breast cancer comparing healthy women from the breast cancer families to healthy population controls