Table 2.
Results of one-versus-one and one-versus-all methods when different kernels were used. True positive rates (%) are given in parentheses and accuracy (%) can be found from the last column.
| Kernel/class | Bad | Good | Semigood | ACC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-versus-all | ||||
| Linear | 22 (53.7%) | 51 (68.9%) | 18 (31.0%) | 52.6% |
| Polynomial deg = 2 | 23 (56.1%) | 50 (67.6%) | 26 (44.8%) | 57.2% |
| Polynomial deg = 3 | 18 (43.9%) | 43 (58.1%) | 22 (37.9%) | 48.0% |
| Polynomial deg = 4 | 23 (56.1%) | 39 (52.7%) | 20 (34.5%) | 47.4% |
| Polynomial deg = 5 | 25 (61.0%) | 34 (45.9%) | 17 (29.3%) | 43.9% |
| Polynomial deg = 6 | 23 (56.1%) | 33 (44.6%) | 18 (31.0%) | 42.8% |
| RBF | 25 (61.0%) | 50 (67.6%) | 29 (50.0%) | 60.1% |
|
| ||||
| One-versus-one | ||||
| Linear | 28 (68.3%) | 52 (70.3%) | 25 (43.1%) | 60.7% |
| Polynomial deg = 2 | 21 (51.2%) | 46 (62.2%) | 15 (25.9%) | 47.4% |
| Polynomial deg = 3 | 20 (48.8%) | 45 (60.8%) | 24 (41.4%) | 51.4% |
| Polynomial deg = 4 | 14 (34.1%) | 41 (55.4%) | 21 (36.2%) | 43.9% |
| Polynomial deg = 5 | 24 (58.5%) | 32 (43.2%) | 21 (36.2%) | 44.5% |
| Polynomial deg = 6 | 19 (46.3%) | 39 (52.7%) | 17 (29.3%) | 43.4% |
| RBF | 27 (65.9%) | 50 (67.6%) | 24 (41.4%) | 58.4% |