[Table/Fig-8]:
Studies assessing hospital based population.
Author | Sample size | Age | State | Prevalence Rate | Method of Assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bansal M et al., 2015 [36] | 500 | 15-74 | Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh | the prevalence of periodontal disease was found to be 96.30% | CPITN |
S fotedar et al., 2014 [37] | 351 | 21-70 | Shimla, Himachal Pradesh | 75 .1% | CPI |
S. Sanadhya et al., 2015 [38] | 1200 | 30-49 | Udaipur, rajasthan | (51.1%) rural population and (43.1%)urban | CPI and loss of attachment |
Peter KP et al., 2014 [39] | 700 | 30 or more | Aurangabad, Maharashtra | 72% of the individuals having at least one site with CAL ≥3mm. Almost 41% of population had at least one site with CAL ≥5mm almost 21% of individuals had at least three sites with CAL ≥5mm. | -Oral Hygiene Index (Greene and Vermillion) -Plaque Index (Turesky-Gilmore-Glickman modification of the Quigley Hein Plaque Index 1970) - Gingival Index (Loe and Silness 1967). -Probing Depth (PD) -Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) |