Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 1;10(6):ZE04–ZE09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17958.7962

[Table/Fig-8]:

Studies assessing hospital based population.

Author Sample size Age State Prevalence Rate Method of Assessment
Bansal M et al., 2015 [36] 500 15-74 Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh the prevalence of periodontal disease was found to be 96.30% CPITN
S fotedar et al., 2014 [37] 351 21-70 Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 75 .1% CPI
S. Sanadhya et al., 2015 [38] 1200 30-49 Udaipur, rajasthan (51.1%) rural population and (43.1%)urban CPI and loss of attachment
Peter KP et al., 2014 [39] 700 30 or more Aurangabad, Maharashtra 72% of the individuals having at least one site with CAL ≥3mm. Almost 41% of population had at least one site with CAL ≥5mm almost 21% of individuals had at least three sites with CAL ≥5mm. -Oral Hygiene Index (Greene and Vermillion)
-Plaque Index (Turesky-Gilmore-Glickman modification of the Quigley Hein Plaque Index 1970)
- Gingival Index (Loe and Silness 1967).
-Probing Depth (PD)
-Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure