Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;8(7):61. doi: 10.3390/cancers8070061

Table 1.

Comparison of different circulating biomarkers.

Marker Pros Cons References
Circulating tumor cells Can reflect tumor morphology and pathological identification Very rare [23,26,67,68,69,70,71]
Prognostic indicator of disease Downstream assays may be affected by blood cells
May represent tumor heterogeneity
Can also be used for genetic analysis such as gene expression profiling or mutation analysis
Circulating RNA May provide tissue-specific information Multiple miRNA signatures required to provide clinical utility [36,37,40,42,43]
May provide patient-specific response Tumor-specific signatures may be indistinguishable from other signals
miRNA may be affected by hemolysis
Circulating proteins Inform dynamic changes occurring in cell Constant modification of proteins not reflective of a specific signature [47,60]
Inform changes caused to microenvironment Difficult to detect very low amounts of protein
Circulating DNA Monitor treatment response in patients Dying cells can contaminate samples [26,66,71,72]
Difficult to differentiate between cell free DNA and circulating tumor DNA