Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 25;8(7):392. doi: 10.3390/nu8070392

Table 3.

Effect of gastrointestinal distress on mean sprint power.

Relative Difference (%) in Mean Sprint Power
Low HMS–G Iso HMS–G Iso HMS–Low HMS
Unadjusted mean sprint power −5.0; ±5.3 −0.6; ±3.0 4.4; ±3.2
likely small likely trivial likely small
Effect of gastrointestinal distress −5.5; ±2.2 −1.4; ±1.4 −0.3; ±0.2
very likely small ** unclear Unclear **
Effect independent of gastrointestinal distress 0.4; ±3.5 0.8; ±3.1 4.7; ±2.7
Unclear ** likely trivial likely small
Effect of Individual Symptoms
Effect of nausea −5.2; ±2.7 −1.4; ±1.6 0.1; ±0.1
Unclear ** likely trivial ** Unclear **
Effect independent of nausea 0.1; ±4.2 0.9; ±3.2 4.4; ±2.7
Unclear ** likely trivial ** likely small
Effect of abdominal cramp −2.9; ±2.0 ** −0.3; ±0.6 0.4; ±1.4
unclear most likely trivial ** Unclear **
Effect independent of abdominal cramp −2.0; ±4.4 ** −0.2; ±3.1 4.0; ±3.7
possibly trivial Unclear ** possibly small **

Note: Data is presented as relative differences between treatments ±90% confidence interval. G, a glucose and sucrose-based supplement; Low HMS, low dose of hydrothermally-modified starch; Iso HMS, an isocaloric dose (relative to G) of hydrothermally-modified starch; * gastrointestinal distress refers only to effects of nausea and abdominal cramp because ratings of fullness did not correlate with changes in performance; ** indicates a change in effect magnitude and/or inference mediated by the covariate.