Table 1. Phylogenetic signal per EBDCS level 1 state categories.
N | Prevalence | D-statistic |
Phylogenetic signal |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median | Range | p(D < 1)a | strengthb | |||
Animal food | 12 | 0.02 | 0.98 | 0.55–1.47 | ns | weak |
Environmental uses | 18 | 0.03 | 0.90 | 0.56–1.27 | ns | weak |
Materials | 15 | 0.03 | 0.88 | 0.61–1.21 | ns | weak |
Medicines | 65 | 0.12 | 0.76 | 0.65–0.88 | *** | weak |
Non-Vertebrate poisons | 9 | 0.02 | 0.85 | 0.39–1.57 | ns | weak |
Social uses | 8 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 0.15–1.51 | ns | weak |
Vertebrate poisons | 46 | 0.08 | 1.06 | 0.90–1.26 | ns | weak |
Phylogenetic signal (D-statistic) on a randomly selected subset of 1,000 Bayesian trees within the 95% credible set of uses of Euphorbia31 classified into level 1 state categories according to the Economic Botany Data Collection Standard (EBDCS). Out of all level 1 state categories only medicines shows phylogenetic signal (in bold). N: Number of species.
a* 95% p < 0.05; *** all p < 0.005.
bweak: <90% p(D > 0) > 0.05; moderate: 90% p(D > 0) > 0.05; strong: 95% p(D > 0) > 0.05; very strong: all p(D > 0) > 0.05.