Table 2. Phylogenetic signal per EBDCS level 2 state categories medicines and the category inflammatory response.
N | Prevalence | D-statistic |
Phylogenetic signal |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median | Range | p(D < 1)a | strengthb | |||
Abnormalities | 12 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 0.48–1.20 | ns | weak |
Digestive system disorders | 26 | 0.05 | 0.78 | 0.51–1.04 | ns | weak |
Genitourinary system disorders | 9 | 0.02 | 0.35 | −0.06–0.87 | * | moderate |
Infections/infestations | 21 | 0.04 | 0.82 | 0.50–1.15 | ns | weak |
Inflammation | 11 | 0.02 | 0.54 | 0.09–1.27 | ns | weak |
Injuries | 16 | 0.03 | 0.88 | 0.52–1.25 | ns | weak |
Pain | 15 | 0.03 | 0.78 | 0.43–1.19 | ns | weak |
Respiratory system disorders | 10 | 0.02 | 0.89 | 0.39–1.38 | ns | weak |
Skin-/subcutaneous cellular tissue disorders | 27 | 0.05 | 0.73 | 0.50–0.95 | ns | weak |
Unspecified medicinal disorders | 27 | 0.05 | 0.65 | 0.43–0.88 | * | weak |
Inflammatory response | 44 | 0.08 | 0.88 | 0.68–1.03 | ns | weak |
No inflammatory response | 12 | 0.02 | 0.85 | 0.49–1.29 | ns | weak |
Unknown | 23 | 0.04 | 1.05 | 0.77–1.37 | ns | weak |
Phylogenetic signal (D-statistic) on a randomly selected subset of 1,000 Bayesian trees within the 95% credible set of uses of Euphorbia31 classified into level 2 state categories of medicines according to the Economic Botany Data Collection Standard (EBDCS) and the category inflammatory response. EBDCS categories genitourinary system disorders and unspecified medicinal disorders show phylogenetic signal (in bold), while the EBDCS category inflammation and the category inflammatory response don’t. N: Number of species.
a* 95% p < 0.05; *** all p < 0.005.
bweak: <90% p(D > 0) > 0.05; moderate: 90% p(D > 0) > 0.05; strong: 95% p(D > 0) > 0.05; very strong: all p(D > 0) > 0.05.