Table 1.
Comparison | θII (s.e.) | θI (s.e.) | LRT θI | Qk > 0.9 |
---|---|---|---|---|
PAT1/SHR | −0.14 (0.64) | 0.53 (0.12) | 19.29 | 3 |
PAT1/LISCL | −0.09 (0.52) | 0.57 (0.12) | 21.59 | 4 |
PAT1/SCL3 | −0.83 (0.88) | 0.42 (0.18) | 5.50 | 0 |
PAT1/DELLA | −0.16 (0.50) | 0.40 (0.19) | 4.38 | 0 |
PAT1/SCR | 0.42 (0.38) | 0.70 (0.15) | 22.69 | 6 |
PAT1/HAM | 0.53 (0.47) | 0.87 (0.12) | 53.81 | 22 |
PAT1/GRAS | 0.49 (0.36) | 0.70 (0.17) | 17.09 | 5 |
SHR/LISCL | 0.52 (0.28) | 0.87 (0.13) | 42.95 | 24 |
SHR/SCL3 | −0.31 (0.91) | 0.46 (0.18) | 6.76 | 1 |
SHR/DELLA | 0.60 (0.20) | 0.83 (0.20) | 16.88 | 9 |
SHR/SCR | 0.42 (0.58) | 0.98 (0.25) | 15.70 | 37 |
SHR/HAM | −0.28 (0.89) | 0.61 (0.14) | 17.82 | 5 |
SHR/GRAS | 0.52 (0.27) | 0.61 (0.15) | 17.17 | 2 |
LISCL/SCL3 | −0.70 (0.73) | 0.42 (0.16) | 7.43 | 0 |
LISCL/DELLA | −0.28 (0.45) | 0.86 (0.10) | 70.47 | 24 |
LISCL/SCR | 0.35 (0.45) | 0.86 (0.14) | 39.74 | 24 |
LISCL/HAM | 0.25 (0.52) | 0.82 (0.10) | 63.63 | 19 |
LISCL/GRAS | 0.18 (0.39) | 0.50 (0.10) | 25.85 | 4 |
SCL3/DELLA | −0.79 (0.76) | 0.33 (0.21) | 2.54 | 0 |
SCL3/SCR | −1.83 (1.36) | 0.62 (0.20) | 9.98 | 2 |
SCL3/HAM | −1.18 (1.22) | 0.68 (0.14) | 22.61 | 5 |
SCL3/GRAS | −0.15 (0.65) | 0.42 (0.19) | 4.73 | 0 |
DELLA/SCR | 0.37 (0.44) | 0.74 (0.22) | 11.75 | 3 |
DELLA/HAM | 0.47 (0.33) | 0.74 (0.14) | 29.55 | 9 |
DELLA/GRAS | 0.39 (0.29) | 0.58 (0.16) | 12.54 | 2 |
SCR/HAM | −0.22 (0.85) | 0.46 (0.12) | 13.96 | 3 |
SCR/GRAS | −0.38 (0.67) | 0.58 (0.18) | 10.66 | 1 |
HAM/GRAS | 0.27 (0.50) | 0.55 (0.10) | 27.61 | 5 |
θI and θII: the coefficients of Type I and Type II functional divergence. LRT: likelihood ratio test statistics. Qk: posterior probability.