Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 28;6:30271. doi: 10.1038/srep30271

Table 5. Evaluation of eGFR with different equations (top panel) and concordance of attribution to each class of eGFR with Cohen’s weighted K test (bottom panel).

  CKD-EPI (ml/min/1.73 m2) MDRD (ml/min/1.73 m2) Cockcroft-Gault (ml/min) Cockcroft-Gault adjusted (ml/min/1.73 m2)
2398 patients 2398 patients 2398 patients 2398 patients
Number of patients (%) with eGFR ≥80 842 (35.1%) 902 (37.6%) 1076 (44.9%) 770 (32.1%)
Number of patients (%) with eGFR 50–79 1133 (47.2%) 1143 (47.7%) 879 (36.7%) 1117 (46.6%)
Number of patients (%) with eGFR 30–49 334 (13.9%) 285 (11.9%) 354 (14.8%) 411 (17.1%)
Number of patients (%) with eGFR <30 89 (3.7%) 68 (2.8%) 89 (3.7%) 100 (4.2%)
Mean ± SD of eGFR 69.93 ± 21.19 73.77 ± 23.87 79.74 ± 33.77 70.41 ± 25.71
Weighted K coefficients (and 95% CI) and classes of renal function based on eGFR estimates
  MDRD Cockcroft-Gault Cockcroft-Gault adjusted  
CKD-EPI 0.8918 (0.8776–0.9061) 0.6242 (0.6000–0.6483) 0.7254 (0.7039–0.7469)  
MDRD   0.5755 (0.5499–0.6012) 0.6404 (0.6164–0.6643)  
Cockcroft-Gault     0.7654 (0.7460–0.7848)