Skip to main content
letter
. 2016 Feb 8;12(7):1940–1942. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1143159

Table 1.

Bivalent HPV vaccine efficacy against individual vaccine and non-vaccine HPV types: Comparison of 6-month persistent infection.

  Phase III (Study 008-PATRICIA).9,10 Follow-up: 4 y TVC-Na
Phase II (Study 007).11 Follow-up: up to 6.4 y ATP-Eb
Phase II (Study 023).12 Follow-up: up to 8 y ATP-Eb
HPV Type Vaccine N = 5427 Control N = 5399 VE % (95% CI) VaccinecN = 560 ControlcN = 553 VE % (95% CI) Vaccine N = 223 Control N = 213 VE % (95% CI)
HPV16/18 35 521 94 (91.1, 95.6)* 0 34 100 (90, 100)* 0 17 100 (80, 100)*
HPV16 22 395 95 (91.8, 96.7)* 0 27 100 (87, 100)* 0 12 100 (69, 100)*
HPV18 13 166 92 (86.5, 96)* 0 10 100 (60, 100)* 0 8 100 (50, 100)*
HPV31 38 163 77 (67.2, 84.4)* 5 9 48 (<0, 86) 6 6 10 (<0, 76)
HPV33 53 92 43 (19.3, 60.2)* 6 5 −16 (<0, 71) 6 4 −37 (<0, 68)
HPV45 13 61 79 (61.3, 89.4)* 2 4 52 (<0, 96) 5 3 −52 (<0, 70)

*= statistical significance; ATP-E = according-to-protocol for efficacy; TVC-N = total vaccinated cohort-naive; VE = vaccine effectiveness

a

TVC-N: included subjects who were given at least 1 vaccine dose, were evaluable for efficacy and at baseline had normal cytology, were DNA (−) for all 14 oncogenic HPV types investigated, and were sero (−) for HPV 16 and 18; cases were counted after Day 1; in Protocol 008, the efficacy analyses for HPV 16 and/or 18 were performed in the ATP-E population.

b

ATP-E: included subjects who met all eligibility criteria, complied with study procedures, and had data available for the efficacy measure considered; TVC-N in Protocol 008 and ATP-E in Protocol 007/023 are equivalent since subjects in 007/023 were only enrolled if they were PCR (−) to the 14 HPV types tested, sero (−) to HPV 16 and 18, and had a normal Pap test at screening.

c

Number of subjects represent enrollment into the initial study, Protocol 001; of these, 393 and 383 vaccine and placebo recipients, respectively, continued in the follow-up study (Protocol 007); all subjects with follow-up were included in efficacy analyses.