Table 3. Impact of intervention on recovery from ICD-10 CMD at 6 months among ICD-10 definite CMD cases at baseline (primary analysis), and ICD-10 depression and anxiety cases at baseline (secondary analyses), by facility type.
Diagnostic group at baseline | Type of facility |
p-value for effect modification | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All facilities | PHC | GPs | ||
Primary: ICD-10 cases (all) (n=1961) | ||||
Collaborative Stepped Care | 620 (65.0%) | 369 (65.9%) | 251 (64.1%) | |
Enhanced Usual Care | 553 (52.9%) | 267 (42.5%) | 286 (65.9%) | |
Risk difference (95% CI) | 12.1% (1.6%, 22.5%) | 23.4% (5.0%, 41.7%) | -1.8% (-17.7%, 14.1%) | 0.001 |
Risk ratio (95% CI) | 1.22 (1.00, 1.47) | 1.55 (1.02, 2.35) | 0.95 (0.74, 1.22) | 0.001 |
P-value | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.63 | |
| ||||
Secondary: Depression cases (n=673) | ||||
Collaborative Stepped Care | 142 (53.6%) | 80 (52.1%) | 62 (55.1%) | |
Enhanced Usual Care | 216 (50.4%) | 114 (38.8%) | 102 (65.5%) | |
Risk difference (95% CI) | 3.2% (-9.4%, 15.7%) | 13.3% (-10.1%, 36.6%) | -10.4% (-29.0%, 8.1%) | 0.008 |
Risk ratio (95% CI) | 1.05 (0.81, 1.36) | 1.34 (0.73, 2.45) | 0.82 (0.60, 1.12) | 0.007 |
P-value | 0.69 | 0.25 | 0.18 |