Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 28;11(7):e0160056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160056

Table 3. Comparison of the percentage of correct answers for emotion recognition in FEP, BPD and HC.

Unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

Unadjusted analyses
Emotion recognition FEPa (N = 64) BPDb (N = 37) HCc (N = 137) Kruskal-Wallis test
mean (SD) mean (SD) mean (SD) χ2(df = 2) p-value
Neutral 78.3 (16.6)c 74.2 (14.4)c 83.9 (11.7)a,b 14.52 0.0007
Happiness 88.4 (11.5) 86.5 (13.5) 90.4 (9.7) 2.61 0.2709
Fear 50.7 (20.1) 56.1 (17.4) 53 (19.5) 1.96 0.3758
Anger 58.5 (22.2)c 65.2 (21.2) 68.1 (21.3)a 8.29 0.0158
Recognition 69 (11.5)c 70.5 (10.4) 73.8 (9.7)a 11.81 0.0027
Adjusted analyses*
Emotion recognition FEP (N = 64) BPD (N = 37) HC (N = 137) p-value
β β β FEP vs. HC BPD vs. HC
Neutral -4.89 -8.48 Ref. 0.0343 0.0027
Happiness -1.53 -3.48 Ref. 0.4012 0.1174
Fear -0.26 3.48 Ref. 0.9347 0.3744
Anger -8.84 -2.06 Ref. 0.0152 0.6406
Recognition -3.88 -2.63 Ref. 0.0249 0.2092

a,b,c Superscript letters indicate significant differences among groups by Scheffe test for multiple comparison.

* Comparison of the percentage of correct answers for emotion recognition between groups adjusting for WAIS, age and sex by means of the general linear models.

SD: standard deviation; df: degrees of freedom; β: beta parameter estimated from the general linear model, considering the healthy controls (HC) as reference group; Ref: Reference group.