Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2016 Apr 18;35(21):3717–3732. doi: 10.1002/sim.6965

Table 2.

Summary of estimator performance over 5,000 simulations. The rows denote target parameter, the study design, and the estimator: unadjusted, TMLE with logistic regression, and TMLE with SuperLearner (“TMLE+SL”).

Target & Design Estimator Bias σ MSE rMSE Power Coverage
Sample Size n = 30
PATE & not matched Unadj 2.3E-4 2.2E-2 4.8E-4 1.00 0.27 0.95
TMLE 6.8E-4 1.9E-2 3.6E-4 0.75 0.36 0.94
TMLE+SL 2.9E-4 1.6E-2 2.6E-4 0.55 0.48 0.93
SATE & not matched Unadj 3.1E-4 2.0E-2 4.2E-4 0.88 0.27 0.96
TMLE 7.5E-4 1.7E-2 3.0E-4 0.63 0.39 0.95
TMLE+SL 3.7E-4 1.4E-2 2.0E-4 0.42 0.52 0.95
SATE & matched Unadj 5.4E-5 1.5E-2 2.2E-4 0.46 0.37 0.98
TMLE 3.7E-4 1.4E-2 2.1E-4 0.43 0.44 0.97
TMLE+SL 1.3E-4 1.1E-2 1.3E-4 0.27 0.58 0.97

Sample Size n = 50
PATE & not matched Unadj −1.3E-4 1.7E-2 3.0E-4 1.00 0.41 0.94
TMLE 1.1E-4 1.5E-2 2.2E-4 0.75 0.53 0.94
TMLE+SL −3.1E-6 1.2E-2 1.6E-4 0.53 0.68 0.94
SATE & not matched Unadj 4.8E-5 1.6E-2 2.5E-4 0.86 0.41 0.96
TMLE 2.9E-4 1.3E-2 1.8E-4 0.60 0.55 0.96
TMLE+SL 1.8E-4 1.1E-2 1.1E-4 0.38 0.70 0.97
SATE & matched Unadj −1.8E-4 1.1E-2 1.1E-4 0.38 0.59 0.98
TMLE −1.6E-4 1.0E-2 1.1E-4 0.36 0.66 0.97
TMLE+SL −5.7E-5 8.2E-3 6.7E-5 0.23 0.81 0.98