Table 2.
Measures comparison of included versus excluded participants
| Measure | Included (n = 158) | Excluded (n = 146) | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASH at entry | 49.6 ± 17.3 | 54.8 ± 17.7 | 0.016 | ||
| Constant-Murley score at entry | 39.2 ± 15.6 | 37.2 ± 15.7 | 0.323 | ||
| Brief Pain Inventory at entry | 4.4 ± 2.2 | 4.8 ± 2.1 | 0.199 | ||
| Patient Global Impression of Change (categories) | Improved | Not improved | Improved | Not improved | 0.033 |
| Number of patients | 57 (36%) | 101 (64%) | 37 (25%) | 112 (75%) | |
| Age (years) | 47.1 ± 11.1 | 48.1 ± 10.1 | 0.406 | ||
| Cumulative Illness Rating Scale | 4.7 ± 2.5 | 5.0 ± 2.2 | 0.458 | ||
| INTERMED biological | 8.6 ± 1.4 | 9.4 ± 1.4 | < 0.001 | ||
| Abbreviated Injury Scale (categories) | Minor | Moderate or serious | Minor | Moderate or serious | 0.402 |
| Number of patients | 91 (58%) | 67 (42%) | 69 (53%) | 62 (47%) | |
| Sex (categories) | Men | Women | Men | Women | 0.854 |
| Number of patients | 129 (82%) | 29 (18%) | 118 (81%) | 28 (19%) | |
| INTERMED psychological | 3.3 ± 2.6 | 4.5 ± 3.0 | < 0.001 | ||
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety | 8.9 ± 4.3 | 9.8 ± 4.6 | 0.109 | ||
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale -Depression | 6.4 ± 3.9 | 7.7 ± 4.7 | 0.017 | ||
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale | 21.4 ± 12.5 | 23.5 ± 12.3 | 0.241 | ||
| Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia | 44.9 ± 7.8 | 45.7 ± 8.2 | 0.369 | ||
| INTERMED social | 5.2 ± 1.7 | 5.8 ± 2.1 | 0.005 | ||
| Education (years) | > 9 | ≤ 9 | > 9 | ≤ 9 | 0.052 |
| Number of patients | 67 (42%) | 91 (58%) | 41 (31%) | 90 (69%) | |
| French native language | Yes | No | Yes | No | 0.020 |
| Number of patients | 68 (43%) | 90 (57%) | 39 (30%) | 92 (70%) | |
| Professional qualification | Yes | No | Yes | No | 0.392 |
| Number of patients | 52 (33%) | 106 (67%) | 37 (28%) | 94 (72%) | |
Quantitative values = mean ± SD.