Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 1;19(4):284–290. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0101

Table 4.

Correlations of FIB and simulated CAT Scores with Each Other and Outcomes Self-reported Job Performance, Absenteeism, and Hospital Admissions

Well-Being Element CAT Score Job Performance (n = 7332) Absenteeism (n = 10,765) Admissions (n = 11,347)
Purpose
 FIB 0.980 0.399 −0.092 −0.045
 CAT   0.392 −0.091 −0.046
Difference [CI]   0.007* [0.003, 0.011] −0.001 [−0.004, 0.003] 0.001 [−0.003, 0.005]
Community
 FIB 0.969 0.255 −0.072 −0.012
 CAT   0.226 −0.065 −0.015
Difference [CI]   0.029* [0.023, 0.034] −0.006* [−0.011, −0.002] 0.002 [−0.002, 0.007]
Financial
 FIB 0.975 0.220 −0.138 −0.036
 CAT   0.219 −0.130 −0.038
Difference [CI]   0.001 [−0.004, 0.006] −0.009* [−0.013, −0.005] 0.002 [−0.002, 0.006]
Social
 FIB 0.990 0.289 −0.079 −0.006
 CAT   0.284 −0.076 −0.004
Difference [CI]   0.005* [0.002, 0.008] −0.003* [−0.006, −0.001] −0.003* [−0.005, 0.000]
*

Difference between correlations is significantly different from zero with a Type I Error rate of 0.05.

FIB, full item bank; CAT, computerized adaptive testing.