Table 2.
Overall: agreement between algorithm- and expert-assigned modules, with an assessment of the degree of information loss when the two approaches were discordant
Jobs in reliability study (n = 1251) | Extrapolated proportion (%) of all jobsb | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | %a | |||||
Exact match | 722 | 57.7 | 67.5 | |||
No match | ||||||
Solvent/industry solvent mismatch | 46 | 3.7 | 3.8 | |||
No information loss | 247 | 19.7 | 15.0 | |||
Low information loss | 34 | 2.7 | 2.3 | |||
Medium information loss | 80 | 6.4 | 5.3 | |||
High information loss | 122 | 9.8 | 6.2 |
aProportions are unadjusted for sampling weights.
bExtrapolation to all jobs was calculated by weighting each stratum-specific agreement by the proportion of all jobs observed in that stratum. For example the strata-specific agreement for the Chemist Module, Farming and Food Industry Module, and Industry Solvent Module accounted for 0.9, 18.8, and 0.3% of the extrapolated estimate, respectively. Proportions of all jobs each stratum represented are shown in Table 1 for most modules and Table 4 for the Solvent and Work Location Modules.