Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007 Apr 3;86(4):822–837. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.03.012

Table 2. Mean (SEM) number of days to reach initial MAD stability, response latencies, and saccharin phenotype scores for groups responding under delay discounting schedules for cocaine.

N Days to MAD Stability 0.2 vs. 0.6 mg/kg Cocaine 0.4 vs. 1.2 mg/kg Cocaine 0.8 vs. 2.4 mg/kg Cocaine Saccharin Phenotype Score
Left Response Latency (sec) Right Response Latency (sec) Left Response Latency (sec) Right Response Latency (sec) Left Response Latency (sec) Right Response Latency (sec)
HiSF 12 23.7(4.3) 288.5(51.8) 217.7(20.2) 125.4(22.4) 108.2(13.7) 393.0(38.8) 352.2(23.4)a 23.5(3.6)
LoSF 12 13.8(1.5)c 315.9(36.9) 228.1(35.4) 236.1(81.5) 142.2(19.6) 801.4(386.2) 471.6(85.9) 9.6(2.7)c
HiSM 11 13.7(2.1)b 331.4(65.0) 255.1(61.3) 119.3(21.1) 134.7(31.4) 415.3(90.4) 406.6(94.0)a 12.8(2.9)b
LoSM 12 10.5(1.8)b,c 339.8(39.7) 298.1(80.5) 300.9(146.2) 454.8(199.2) 527.6(117.0) 304.3(81.7)a 4.0(1.2)b,c
a

significantly greater than the 0.2 vs. 0.6 mg/kg cocaine condition

b

significantly less than HiS and LoS females

c

significantly less than HiS males and females