Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 1;134(7):734–740. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0913

Table 2.

Cox Proportional Hazards Analysis of Clinical, Pathologic, and Molecular Prognostic Variables

Covariate Regression Coefficient, β (SE) Wald Statistic P Value Hazard Coefficient, Exp(b) (95% CI)
Ciliary body involvementa −0.391 (0.391)   1.002   .32   0.68 (0.32–1.45)
Epithelioid cellsa −0.020 (0.369)   0.003   .96   0.98 (0.48–2.01)
Class 2 GEPa   2.335 (0.449) 26.949 <.001 10.33 (4.30–24.84)
Patient agea   0.013 (0.0119)   1.154   .28   1.01 (0.99–1.04)
Tumor thicknessa   0.043 (0.0516)   0.709   .40   1.04 (0.95–1.16)
LBDa   0.125 (0.056)   5.049   .02   1.13 (1.02–1.26)
 Class 1 GEPb   0.151 (0.083)   3.272   .07   1.16 (0.99–1.37)
 Class 2 GEPb   0.126 (0.045)   7.789   .005   1.13 (1.04–1.24)

Abbreviations: GEP, gene expression profile; LBD, largest basal tumor diameter.2

a

Expressed as results of multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression, performed on 339 patients with uveal melanoma, with progression-free survival as the end point.

b

Expressed as results of univariate Cox proportional hazards regression, performed on 190 patients with class 1 and 149 patients with class 2 uveal melanoma, with LBD as the variable and progression-free survival as the end point.