Table 1.
Compilation of Middle-Up and Middle-Down Results of the Three Antibodies
Antibody | Subunit | SC [%] | SVP [%] | Mass Acc. [ppm] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Panitumumab | LC | 92.1 | 100.0 | 0.6 |
Fc/2 deglyc. | 90.5 | 100.0 | 0.8 | |
Fd | 87.2 | 97.9 | 0.6 | |
Cetuximab | LC | 92.5 | 100.0 | 0.7 |
Fc/2 | 91.9 | 100.0 | 0.6 | |
Fd | 87.0 | 96.2 | 0.8 | |
Fd deglyc. | 92.9 | 100.0 | — | |
Natalizumab | LC | 89.2 | 98.1 | 0.7 |
Fc/2 deglyc. | 90.5 | 100.0 | 0.7 | |
in-house→ | Fd Seq. A | 79.9 | 90.0 | 78.0 |
Wang et al. → | Fd Seq. B | 90.4 | 100.0 | 0.8 |
Summary of all middle-down and middle-up results from the subunits of panitumumab (IgG2), cetuximab (IgG1) and natalizumab (IgG4). SVP was 100 % or near 100 % for the correct sequences. They were in parallel validated by middle-up analysis and confirmed by mass accuracy <1 ppm. In the case of cetuximab Fd, a glycan modification at residue 88 decreased SVP to 96 %, deglycosylation provided 100 % SVP. For natalizumab Fd, SVP and UHR-QTOF results clearly confirmed “sequence B” published by Wang et al. as the correct sequence. 24