Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 13;8(2):318–330. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2015.1128607

Table 1.

Compilation of Middle-Up and Middle-Down Results of the Three Antibodies

Antibody Subunit SC [%] SVP [%] Mass Acc. [ppm]
Panitumumab LC 92.1 100.0 0.6
  Fc/2 deglyc. 90.5 100.0 0.8
  Fd 87.2 97.9 0.6
Cetuximab LC 92.5 100.0 0.7
  Fc/2 91.9 100.0 0.6
  Fd 87.0 96.2 0.8
  Fd deglyc. 92.9 100.0
Natalizumab LC 89.2 98.1 0.7
  Fc/2 deglyc. 90.5 100.0 0.7
in-house→ Fd Seq. A 79.9 90.0 78.0
Wang et al. → Fd Seq. B 90.4 100.0 0.8

Summary of all middle-down and middle-up results from the subunits of panitumumab (IgG2), cetuximab (IgG1) and natalizumab (IgG4). SVP was 100 % or near 100 % for the correct sequences. They were in parallel validated by middle-up analysis and confirmed by mass accuracy <1 ppm. In the case of cetuximab Fd, a glycan modification at residue 88 decreased SVP to 96 %, deglycosylation provided 100 % SVP. For natalizumab Fd, SVP and UHR-QTOF results clearly confirmed “sequence B” published by Wang et al. as the correct sequence. 24