Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;134(3):294–303. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5601

Table 4. Pooled multivariable relative risks (95% CI)* for quintiles of daily servings of foods high in nitrate in relation to all primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and POAG with early paracentral visual field loss (“Para-POAG”) in Nurses' Health Study (1984-2012) and in Health Professionals' Follow-up Study (1986-2012).

Quintiles of intake of foods [median servings per day]
% Variability in nitrate explained Outcome Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 p-trend
Green leafy vegetables 56.7% Median 0.31 0.56 0.75 1.00 1.45
All POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.95 (0.81, 1.12) 0.90 (0.66, 1.22) 0.93 (0.61, 1.44) 0.82 (0.69, 0.97) 0.02
Para-POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.89 (0.57, 1.41) 0.67 (0.49, 0.92) 0.69 (0.51, 0.93) 0.52 (0.29, 0.96) 0.0002
 Iceberg lettuce 23.2% Median 0.11 0.25 0.43 0.55 0.86
All POAG 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (0.83, 1.20) 1.03 (0.87, 1.23) 0.88 (0.69, 1.13) 0.89 (0.75, 1.06) 0.06
Para-POAG 1.00 (ref) 1.03 (0.63, 1.70) 0.89 (0.56, 1.42) 0.72 (0.41, 1.26) 0.69 (0.49, 0.97) 0.001
 Romaine lettuce 17.4% Median 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.25 0.55
All POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.93 (0.77, 1.11) 0.98 (0.82, 1.15) 0.89 (0.76, 1.05) 0.87 (0.74, 1.03) 0.11
Para-POAG 1.00 (ref) 1.10 (0.61, 1.97) 1.17 (0.48, 2.89) 1.01 (0.66, 1.55) 0.71 (0.29, 1.75) 0.19
Kale/mustard/chard greens 6.0% Median 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.07 0.13
All POAG 1.00 (ref) 1.02 (0.84, 1.24) 0.96 (0.77, 1.19) 0.92 (0.61, 1.38) 0.72 (0.54, 0.95) 0.08
Para-POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.97 (0.68, 1.39) 1.03 (0.70, 1.53) 1.09 (0.66, 1.80) 0.33 (0.16, 0.69) 0.01
Cruciferous vegetables 15.9% Median 0.16 0.29 0.42 0.58 0.90
All POAG 1.00 (ref) 1.28 (1.08, 1.52) 1.10 (0.87, 1.38) 1.10 (0.92, 1.32) 1.12 (0.94, 1.35) 0.93
Para-POAG 1.00 (ref) 1.23 (0.90, 1.69) 1.04 (0.75, 1.45) 1.15 (0.83, 1.59) 1.02 (0.73, 1.43) 0.72
Root vegetables§ 9.7% Median 0.50 0.77 1.00 1.29 1.76
All POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.88 (0.73, 1.05) 0.83 (0.63, 1.09) 0.94 (0.64, 1.40) 0.87 (0.56, 1.36) 0.77
All POAG-women 1.00 (ref) 0.88 (0.71, 1.09) 0.93 (0.75, 1.15) 1.13 (0.91, 1.40) 1.07 (0.85, 1.35) 0.12
All POAG-men 1.00 (ref) 0.88 (0.64, 1.21) 0.70 (0.50, 0.97) 0.76 (0.54, 1.05) 0.68 (0.48, 0.96) 0.04
Para-POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.74 (0.48, 1.15) 0.83 (0.59, 1.15) 0.85 (0.27, 2.65) 0.84 (0.34, 2.08) 0.89
Para-POAG-women 1.00 (ref) 0.88 (0.58, 1.35) 0.84 (0.55, 1.28) 1.48 (0.99, 2.20) 1.29 (0.84, 1.98) 0.03
Para- POAG-men 1.00 (ref) 0.56 (0.31, 1.02) 0.80 (0.46, 1.37) 0.46 (0.25, 0.86) 0.51 (0.27, 0.96) 0.04
Celery 6.5% Median 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.23 0.44
All POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.88 (0.73, 1.06) 0.88 (0.63, 1.22) 0.92 (0.77, 1.10) 0.93 (0.78, 1.11) 0.74
Para-POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.80 (0.56, 1.14) 0.76 (0.55, 1.05) 0.72 (0.47, 1.13) 0.93 (0.68, 1.27) 0.79
Tomato – based foods 4.0% 0.21 0.37 0.53 0.71 1.02
All POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.97 (0.83, 1.14) 0.89 (0.75, 1.05) 0.86 (0.73, 1.02) 0.90 (0.75, 1.07) 0.14
Para-POAG 1.00 (ref) 0.94 (0.69, 1.28) 0.89 (0.65, 1.22) 1.02 (0.57, 1.80) 0.84 (0.60, 1.17) 0.37

Abbreviations: RR = Relative Risk; CI = Confidence Interval

*

Intake calculated using cumulative average (i.e., average of all available intake data from food frequency questionnaires completed before each two-year period at risk). Pooled results were calculated using Dersimonian and Laird methods with random effects; p for heterogeneity between cohorts for all p for linear trend results were > 0.05. All multivariable analyses were adjusted for the same variables as in Model 1 in Table 2.

†‡

Kale/mustard/chard greens were included in both the green leafy vegetable and cruciferous vegetable categories. Green leafy vegetables included iceberg lettuce, romaine lettuce, kale/mustard/chard greens, cooked spinach, raw spinach. Cruciferous vegetables included broccoli, cabbage/coleslaw, cauliflower, kale/mustard/chard greens, Brussels sprouts. Root vegetables included potato, beet, onion, carrot and yam / sweet potatoes. Tomato-based foods included whole tomato, tomato sauce and tomato juice.

§

The results for women and men were heterogeneous (p for heterogeneity was 0.01 for all POAG, and it was 0.004 for all Para-POAG); thus, cohort specific results are also provided. For all other food groups, the p for heterogeneity were >0.5