Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1517–1527. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.422

Table 5.

Accuracy of Physician Clinical Impression to Identify Intra-abdominal Injury From Evidence Level 1 to 3 Studies

Clinical Impression Serial Likelihood Ratio (95% CI)
Probability estimate of injury based on overall clinical impression, %17a
 >50    11 (4.1–30)

 >10 to 50   8.9 (5.2–16)

 >5 to 10   2.5 (2.0–3.0)

 1 to 5 0.46 (0.33–0.62)

 <1 0.21 (0.11–0.42)

Overall clinical impression, ordinal ranking from no suspicion (1) to most likely to have an injury (5)25b
 5    19 (7.7–48)

 4   3.2 (1.6–6.5)

 3   1.6 (1.1–2.3)

 2 0.57 (0.32–1.0)

 1 0.38 (0.24–0.61)
a

Clinical impression established before Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination was performed. When dichotomized into injury unlikely (<1%) vs injury possible (≥1%), injury possible has a likelihood ratio of 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2–1.4) and injury unlikely has a likelihood ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.11–0.42).

b

Clinical impression established after FAST examination performed. When dichotomized into no suspicion (1) vs injury possible (>1), injury possible has a likelihood ratio of 1.6 (95% CI, 1.4–1.8) and no suspicion has a likelihood ratio of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.24–0.61).