Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 29;11:108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0475-6

Table 4.

Constructs in the questionnaires

Construct Data source Number of items and response format (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree if not otherwise indicated) Respondent Time of measurement
Primary outcomes
Implementation-specific transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership based on [52, 53] PPQ
PEQ
20 items M
E
T1, T2, T3
Short form of implementation-specific transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership based on [52] PEQ 6 items M WS: 1 and 2, 3, 4, 5
Changes in procedure based on [54] PPQ 3 items M
E
T2, T3
Perceived change [55, 56] PPQ 1 item
1 = large impairment–5 = large improvement
E T2, T3
Secondary outcomes
General transformational leadership and contingent reward transactional leadership based on [57, 58] PPQ 9 items
(2 items)
M
E
T1, T2, T3
Implementation climate based on [59, 60] PPQ 6 items M
E
T1, T2, T3
Quality improvement implementation scale based on [61] PPQ 4 items M
E
T1, T2, T3
Self-rated health [6264] PPQ 1 item
1 = excellent–5 = poor
M
E
T1, T2, T3
Vertical trust [6264] PPQ 4 items M
E
T1, T2, T3
Discomfort with work [65, 66] PPQ 1 item
1 = never–5 = everyday
M
E
T1, T2, T3
Work engagement [67, 68] PPQ 3 items
(1 item for each subscale)
M
E
T1, T2, T3
Job satisfaction ([69], based on [70]) PPQ 3 items M
E
T1, T2, T3
Stress reaction and recovery [62, 64, 65] PPQ 2 item
1 = never–5 = everyday
M
E
T1, T2, T3
Self-rated productivity [71, 72] PPQ 3 items
1 = low–10 = high
M
E
T1, T2, T3
Group process [73] PPQ 4 items M
E
T1, T2, T3
Job crafting based on [74, 75] PPQ 8 items M T1, T2, T3
Qualitative job insecurity based on [76, 77] PPQ 12 items M
E
T2, T3
Process evaluation
Fit of the intervention [78] PPQ 1 item M
E
T2, T3
Direction [78] PPQ 2 items E T2, T3
Opportunity [78] PPQ 1 item E T2, T3
Participation quality [53] PPQ 3 items M
E
T2, T3
Integration into existing processes and structures [78] PPQ 2 items E T2, T3
Readiness for change [53] PEQ 5 items M WS: 1 and 2
Situational motivation [79] PEQ 9 items M WS: 1 and 2
Knowledge developed by the authors PEQ 6 items M WS 1 and 2, 3, 4, 5
Workshop evaluation developed by the authors PEQ 14 items
1 = not valuable–10 = very valuable
M WS 1 and 2, 3, 4, 5
Organizational support [80] PEQ 4 items M WS 1 and 2, 3, 4, 5
Overall evaluation of workshop quality (Fricdrich A, Jenny GJ, Bauer GF: Development of a generic process appraisal scale for organizational health intervention elements, submitted) PEQ 10 items M WS5
Overall outcome expectancy [81] PEQ 3 items M WS5
Overall support of needs (Tafvelin S, Lundmark R, Stenling A: Development and validation of a measure of need supportive implementation scale, in preparation) PEQ 8 items M WS5

Note: Data sources: PPQ = questionnaire, PEQ = workshop survey; Respondent: M = managers, E = employees; Measurement: T1 = baseline questionnaire, WS = workshop (during intervention), T2 = straight after intervention, T3 = 6 months after intervention