Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Feb 28;116(8):1266–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.12.022

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of Adult Survey Respondents in Baltimore and Philadelphia, Food Outlet Access Measures, and Fast Food Dining Frequency by Survey Source

Variable Telephone Survey Point-of-Purchase Survey
Sample Size 1,598 1,642
Demographic Variables
Mean Age (SD)** 45.3 (13.6) 39.5 (14.2)
Gender: % Male** 33.6% 60.5%
Education**
 < High school diploma 11.3% 18.8%
 High school dipl./GED 31.3% 24.8%
 Some college 29.9% 12.9%
 ≥ 4-year college degree 27.5% 8.8%
Race**
 African-American 50.8% 74.2%
 Hispanic/Latino 35.6% 16.6%
 White 12.4% 8.3%
 Other 1.1% 0.9%
Location: Philadelphia (vs. Baltimore) 61.4% 59%
Post-calorie labeling period (6/2010) a 45.5% 49.2%
Food Outlet Access Measures
Fast food outlet density
Within ¼ mile** 0.3 (0.7) 0.5 (0.9)
Within ½ mile^ 1.1 (1.6) 1.3 (1.6)
Within 1 mile* 4.3 (4.0) 4.5 (3.3)
Supermarket outlet density
Within ¼ mile 0.2 (0.5) 0.2 (0.4)
Within ½ mile^ 0.7 (0.8) 0.6 (0.7)
Within 1 mile 2.5 (1.9) 2.4 (1.7)
Presence/absence of fast food outlet
Respondents with ≥1 outlet within ¼ mile** 24.7% 29.7%
Respondents with ≥1 outlet within ½ mile* 53.5% 58.6%
Respondents with ≥1 outlet within 1 mile* 92.0% 95.1%
Presence/absence of supermarket
Respondents with ≥1 outlet within ¼ mile 17.8% 16.2%
Respondents with ≥1 outlet within ½ mile 50.2% 47.5%
Respondents with ≥1 outlet within 1 mile 89.0% 89.7%
Distance to nearest fast food (miles)** 0.6 (0.3) 0.5 (0.3)
Distance to nearest supermarket (miles)** 0.6 (0.4) 0.6 (0.4)
Weekly fast food dining frequency** (times per week) 1.4 (2.2) 5.3 (4.1)

p < .05

^

p < .01,

*

p < .001,

**

p < .0001

a

The percent of respondents from each survey (telephone vs. point-of-purchase) who were interviewed in June 2010, after calorie labeling was introduced in Philadelphia.