Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 29;7(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s13317-016-0082-1

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Differences in number of ANA IIF, anti-dsDNA and ENA determinations between the conventional and the new algorithm. (***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; NS not significant)