Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar 11;215(2):243.e1–243.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.006

Table 3. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in all women and stratified by parity.

Week of induction (n induction group) IOL CD Expectant management CD AOR (95% CI) P
 37 weeks (n=64) 23.4% 19.1% 1.53 (0.76-3.06) 0.23
 38 weeks (n=55) 27.3% 19.7% 2.07 (0.89-4.80) 0.09
 39 weeks (n=248) 18.2% 27.7% 0.79 (0.44-1.42) 0.43
Nulliparas
 37 weeks (n=29) 37.9% 29.3% 1.17 (0.53-2.63) 0.69
 38 weeks (n=23) 47.8% 28.6% 1.29 (0.47-3.40) 0.64
 39 weeks (n=131) 30.5% 32.1% 0.83 (0.45-1.50) 0.53
Multiparas
 37 weeks (n=35) 11.4% 4.2% 3.52 (0.97-12.8) 0.06
 38 weeks (n=32) 12.5% 3.7% 7.47 (1.60-34.8) 0.01
 39 weeks (n=117) 4.2% 8.3% 0.44 (0.04-5.24) 0.52

Legend: CD (cesarean delivery); AOR (adjusted odds ratio). Data presented as rates of cesarean delivery in the induction of labor versus expectant management group. The n by each week gestation represents the number of women in each gestational age undergoing induction excluding women who were induced with a diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Multiple regression models were adjusted for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, and modified bishop score. In addition, the model including all women was also adjusted for nulliparity.