Table 3. Negative binomial generalized estimation equation for the effect of continuity of care on DM-specific emergency room use.
| Incidence rate | Crude IRR | 95% CI | Adjusted IRR | 95% CI | |
| Continuity of care index (COCI) | |||||
| Low (reference) | 0.14 | ||||
| Medium | 0.11 | 0.85* | (0.74, 0.97) | 0.86* | (0.75, 0.99) |
| High (COCI = 1) | 0.06 | 0.50** | (0.44, 0.56) | 0.54** | (0.47, 0.61) |
| Sex | |||||
| Male (reference) | 0.09 | ||||
| Female | 0.09 | 0.94 | (0.83, 1.08) | 0.98 | (0.86, 1.11) |
| Age, years | |||||
| 20–39 (reference) | 0.12 | ||||
| 40–65 | 0.08 | 0.64** | (0.51, 0.81) | 0.56** | (0.45, 0.70) |
| >65 | 0.11 | 0.91 | (0.71, 1.15) | 0.65** | (0.51, 0.82) |
| Area | |||||
| Taipei | 0.09 | ||||
| North | 0.10 | 1.05 | (0.86, 1.30) | 0.95 | (0.77, 1.18) |
| Central | 0.11 | 1.21* | (1.01, 1.44) | 1.10 | (0.92, 1.32) |
| South | 0.08 | 0.92 | (0.75, 1.13) | 0.80* | (0.65, 0.99) |
| Kuoshong-Pingdong | 0.08 | 0.84 | (0.69, 1.03) | 0.80* | (0.65, 0.97) |
| East | 0.11 | 1.27 | (0.88, 1.84) | 1.23 | (0.85, 1.78) |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | |||||
| 1 (reference) | 0.05 | ||||
| 2 | 0.10 | 1.74** | (1.52, 2.00) | 1.50** | (1.30, 1.73) |
| ≥3 | 0.17 | 3.09** | (2.71, 3.52) | 2.15** | (1.83, 2.52) |
| Diabetes Complication Severity Index | |||||
| 0 (reference) | 0.06 | ||||
| 1 | 0.09 | 1.37** | (1.19, 1.58) | 1.05 | (0.90, 1.23) |
| ≥2 | 0.21 | 3.21** | (2.81, 3.65) | 2.09** | (1.79, 2.44) |
| Income, New Taiwan $ | |||||
| <20 000 (reference) | 0.11 | ||||
| 20 000–39 999 | 0.08 | 0.75** | (0.65, 0.88) | 0.86 | (0.74, 1.00) |
| ≥40 000 | 0.08 | 0.80* | (0.67, 0.96) | 0.90 | (0.75, 1.08) |
| Fishermen/farmers | 0.09 | 0.93 | (0.79, 1.10) | 1.02 | (0.86, 1.21) |
CI, confidence interval; IRR, incidence rate ratio.
*P < 0.05.
**P < 0.01.
1 United States $ ≈ 30 New Taiwan $.