Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Process. 2014 Jun 10;53(4):580–595. doi: 10.1111/famp.12085

Table 1.

Significance of indirect effects of intervention through partner reports on conflict in front of the target youth for husbands and wives (N = 331 couples)

Paths Total effect Indirect effect The portion of
the variance
for mediator
Path1:
Intervention → Observable Conflict (wives)
→ Observable Conflict (husbands)
.098*
[.001; .195]
.067*
[.007; .126]
68.37%
Path2:
Intervention → Observable Conflict
(husbands) → Observable Conflict (wives)
.128**
[.037; .218]
.029
[−.010; .068]
22.66%

Note. The values presented are standardized parameters. Bootstrapping with 1,000 replications.

**

p ≤ .01;

*

p ≤ .05, (two-tailed test).