Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 1;6:30730. doi: 10.1038/srep30730

Table 3. Clinical outcome of the affected hips of all ONFH patients based on the ARCO stage in this study.

ARCO stage n VAS
HHS
Clinical outcome#
Pre-Op FU* P Pre-Op FU* P Improved Unchanged Worsened
Stage I 3 2.7 ± 0.6 1.3 ± 0.6 0.047 88.7 ± 2.1 95.0 ± 3.0 0.046 3 0 0
Stage IIa 5 3.6 ± 1.1 1.8 ± 0.8 0.024 77.8 ± 2.4 90.4 ± 3.1 0.000 5 0 0
Stage IIb 6 5.0 ± 1.8 1.5 ± 0.8 0.003 75.7 ± 2.8 87.2 ± 2.2 0.000 6 0 0
Stage IIc 10 4.6 ± 1.9 1.9 ± 1.0 0.001 74.6 ± 3.0 85.4 ± 3.5 0.000 9 1 0
Stage IIIa 18 6.2 ± 1.5 1.9 ± 0.9 0.000 67.7 ± 6.7 81.9 ± 5.4 0.000 15 3 0
Stage IIIb 6 6.5 ± 1.0 2.0 ± 0.9 0.000 67.8 ± 5.0 85.3 ± 4.3 0.000 5 1 0
Stage IIIc 3 8.0 ± 1.0 2.7 ± 0.6 0.003 57.6 ± 4.2 83.0 ± 5.3 0.003 1 1 1
Total 51 5.4 ± 1.9 1.9 ± 0.9 0.000 71.7 ± 8.1 85.3 ± 5.5 0.000 44 6 1

Note: ARCO, Association Research Circulation Osseous.; VAS, visual analogue scale; HHS, Harris hip score. Pre-Op, preoperation; FU, follow-up; *The last follow-up time. #Clinical outcome [26]: ‘Improved’ was defined when significant improvements in pain and function of the affected hip were noted after treatment. ‘Unchanged’ was defined when very little or no changes were noted after treatment. ‘Worsened’ was defined when more pain and less function were noted after treatment.