Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 28;22(28):6456–6468. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6456

Table 2.

Study design and characteristics

Study Year Design Sample size
Type of resection
ERP Control
Porter et al[53] 2000 Retrospective cohort 80 68 PD, TP
Vanounou et al[54] 2007 Retrospective cohort 145 64 PD
Kennedy et al[55] 2007 Retrospective cohort 92 44 PD, TP
Balzano et al[56] 2008 Retrospective cohort 252 252 PD
Kennedy et al[57] 2009 Retrospective cohort 71 40 LP
Nikfarjam et al[58] 2013 Retrospective cohort 20 21 PD
Abu Hilal et al[59] 2013 Retrospective cohort 24 20 PD
Braga et al[60] 2014 Retrospective cohort 115 115 PD
Kobayashi et al[61] 2014 Retrospective cohort 100 142 PD
Nussbaum et al[62] 2014 Retrospective cohort 50 100 LP
Nussbaum et al[63] 2014 Retrospective cohort 100 142 PD
Coolsen et al[64] 2014 Retrospective cohort 1441 86 PD
Shao et al[65] 2015 Retrospective cohort 325 310 PD
Sutcliffe et al[66] 2015 Retrospective cohort 65 65 PD
Joliat et al[67] 2015 Prospective cohort2 74 87 PD
Morales Soriano et al[68] 2015 Retrospective cohort 41 44 PD
Richardson et al[69] 2015 Retrospective cohort 22 44 LP
1

Includes 47 patients treated with an enhanced recovery-like pathway;

2

Only the ERP group was prospective. PD: Pancreaticoduodenectomy; TP: Total pancreatectomy; LP: Left pancreatectomy.