Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 22;57(8):3844–3852. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15144

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparison of aqueous flow by two methods. Aqueous flow was measured by fluorophotometry and anterior chamber cannulation in 10 mice. (A) Aqueous flow was significantly (P = 0.05) lower when measured by fluorophotometry (0.09 ± 0.07 μL/min, error bars are SD) than by anterior chamber cannulation (0.20 ± 0.13 μL/min, *P = 0.05). (B) No correlation existed between the two aqueous flow measurement methods (R2 = 0.04, P > 0.05).