. 2016 Jul 29;82(16):5026–5038. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01342-16

TABLE 3.

Comparison of electrochemical and chromatographic phenazine analyses

Strain	Carbon source	Day	pH	E_ox (V)^a	E_red (V)^a	E_1/2 (V)	Phenazines^b (μg/ml)
Strain	Carbon source	Day	pH	E_ox (V)^a	E_red (V)^a	E_1/2 (V)	PYO	PCA
PA14	Glucose	3	6.8	−0.20	−0.43	−0.31	—^c	5.8
		12	6.2	−0.14	−0.26	−0.20	—	15.9
	2,3-BD	2	6.7	−0.17	−0.21	−0.19	2.6	2.6
		9	6.7	−0.19	−0.42	−0.30	20.0	51.0
				−0.10	−0.28	−0.19
				−0.01	−0.17	−0.09
	Ethanol	3	7.3	−0.19	−0.22	−0.20	3.9	1.0
		8	6.7	−0.13	−0.21	−0.17	10.5	2.7
KRP1	Glucose	2	6.7	−0.18	−0.28	−0.23	3.6	29.0
		10	6.2	−0.14	−0.28	−0.21	—	106.3
	2,3-BD	3	6.7	−0.30	−0.39	−0.34	16.1	19.8
				−0.22	−0.27	−0.25
		12	6.7	−0.12	−0.37	−0.25	3.2	51.2
	Ethanol	2	6.7	−0.22	−0.40	−0.31	6.1	8.1
		6	6.7	−0.19	−0.38	−0.28	—	6.4
PAO1	Glucose	2	6.7	−0.266	−0.385	−0.325	—	—
		7	6.7	−0.22	−0.36	−0.29	—	—
	2,3-BD	3	7.1	−0.19	−0.41	−0.30	—	0.4
		12	6.7	−0.15	−0.40	−0.27		4.5
				0.00	−0.26	−0.13
	Ethanol	3	6.7	—^c	—	—	—	0.8
		8	6.7	−0.21	−0.27	−0.24	—	3.8

E_ox and E_red, oxidation and reduction peak potentials, respectively, derived from the representative CVs in Fig. 4.

Corresponding phenazine concentration related to the representative CV in Fig. 4, not to the averaged phenazine concentrations from Fig. 3.

—, no phenazines were detected or a redox peak was not distinguishable.