Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 1;11(8):e0160184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160184

Fig 2. Metabolic parameters of offspring.

Fig 2

Body weight from d7 to d77 (n = 9 per group) (A), fat pad mass at d28 (n = 19 per group) (B) and d82 (n = 21 per group) (C), food intake at d28 (n = 8 per group) (D) and d82 (n = 15 per group) (E), and hepatic glycogen at d28 (n = 10 per group) (F) and d82 (n = 3 per group) (G). Data are means ± SEM. In all graphs, at least three different litters were considered. In A, a = CC vs. CC-HF, b = CC vs. HH, c = CC-HF vs. HH-HF, d = HH vs. HH-HF. In others, different letters indicate significant differences at p<0,05. Repeated measures two-way ANOVA (A), two-way ANOVA (C, E and G) or t test (B, D and F) was used to compare the groups.