Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2016 Feb 18;11(4):254–261. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1687

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Pairwise comparison of DECT iodine density maps using three different experimental enteric contrast agents for small bowel evaluation in rabbits. Scored median improvement in small bowel wall visualization and scored median improvement in completeness of intraluminal contrast subtraction are shown for tantalum versus tungsten (top pair), tantalum versus bismuth (middle pair), and tungsten versus bismuth (bottom pair). Whiskers denote the 95% confidence interval. * = p < 0.001