Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 13;116(2):272–285. doi: 10.1152/jn.01145.2015

Table 3.

Fit parameters of sine response sway velocity

Off-to-On Transition
On-to-Off Transition
No. Experiment τA, s τP, s ΔtA,P, s τA, s τP, s ΔtA,P, s VAF, %
1 EC SS s.r. on/off, GVS sine 1.61 0.26 * 2.88 0.08 0.17 96.4
0.74/2.68 0.01/1.28 2.14/3.60 0.05/0.31 0.00/0.24
2 EO SS s.r. on/off, GVS sine 2.43 0.04 * 2.11 0.09 0.24 81.9
1.85/3.53 0.02/0.07 1.35/2.97 0.04/0.21 0.13/0.30
3 EO SS s.r. on/off, VS sine 0.01 0.82 1.93 5.64 0.27 * 92.5
0.01/1.05 0.14/3.61 0.43/2.00 4.15/7.22 0.09/0.42
4 Lights on/off, GVS sine 0.56** 0.56** * 2.50 0.44 * 99.1
0.28/2.28 0.28/2.28 0.55/3.93 0.22/0.85
5 Lights on/off, SS sine 0.47 6.21 0.81 0.42 5.80 0.85 99.4
0.01/2.02 0.01/10.00 0.00/1.30 0.01/2.89 0.01/10.00 0.00/1.82
6 Lights on/off, GVS sine, SS s.r. 0.21 0.01 0.45 0.01** 0.01** 0.57 99.0
0.01/0.47 0.01/3.34 0.29/0.63 0.01/0.22 0.01/0.22 0.29/0.64

Values are mean and lower/upper limits of 95% confidence intervals from bootstrap analyses. VAF, variance accounted for by model fits.

*

Adding parameter did not improve fit significantly;

**

varying time constants of amplitude and phase independently from each other did not improve the fit significantly.