Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 2;7:1118. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01118

Table 2.

Mean protein content (g 100 embryos-1) of recommended integrated crop management (ICM) as compared with conventional management practice (CM) for cottonseed embryos in 2012 and 2013.

Year Soil fertility Integrated management strategies N rates (kg ha-1) N application schedule Plant density (plant ha-1) Seedling raising method Protein content Increase of IMS over CM (%) P
2012 LF CM 300 120-180-0-0 18,000 ST 2.01
IMS1 375 75-94-150-56 30,000 SR 2.38 18.38 <0.05
IMS2 525 105-131-210-79 30,000 ST 2.65 32.16 <0.05
HF CM 300 120-180-0-0 18,000 ST 2.35
IMS1 375 75-94-150-56 30,000 SR 2.43 3.35 ns
IMS2 525 105-131-210-79 30,000 ST 2.68 14.18 <0.05
2013 LF CM 300 120-180-0-0 18,000 ST 2.63
IMS1 375 75-94-150-56 30,000 SR 2.91 10.56 <0.05
IMS2 525 105-131-210-79 30,000 ST 3.06 16.47 <0.05
HF CM 300 120-180-0-0 18,000 ST 2.97
IMS1 375 75-94-150-56 30,000 SR 3.07 3.36 ns
IMS2 525 105-131-210-79 30,000 ST 3.30 11.33 <0.01

LF and HF represent the low soil fertility level and high soil fertility level, respectively. CM and IMS represent the conventional management practices and integrated management strategies, respectively. The N application schedules of IMS1 and IMS2 were timed to coincide with growth-driven N demand of cotton plants (see Materials and Methods). ST: Seeds were planted in a nursery bed, and then seedlings were transplanted into the field on May 15th. SR: Seeds were planted with bio-organic fertilizer, and seedlings were transplanted into the field with substrate on May 15th. Probability (P) of significant treatment difference according to a paired t-test; NS, not significantly different at P = 0.05.