Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 27;2(3):293–300. doi: 10.3233/BLC-160060

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the non-randomized study [9] included in this meta-analysis (Leg.: scores ≥7–9, 4–6, <4 are considered as low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively); *= 1 point

Study Selection Comparability of cohorts Outcome Overall
Representativeness Selection of Ascertainment Outcome not Assessment Adequate follow-up Adequacy of
of exposed cohort nonexposed of exposure present at start length follow-up
Burger et al. REF * * * * * * * 7/9