Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 20;40:843. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1016-9

Table 3.

Comparison of intervention to follow-up phase for all subjects in the CFT group

Variables T1
M (SD)
n = 26
T2
M (SD)
n = 26
T3
M (SD)
n = 26
p(T2–T3) p(T1–T3)
Child measures
 Loneliness 36.3 (12.2) 31.6 (8.1) 33.0 (13.7) ns ns
 Popularity 6.9 (3.0) 7.9 (2.7) 7.4 (2.8) ns ns
Parent measures
 QPQ
  Host 2.0 (2.1) 4.0 (1.6) 3.1 (2.9) ns <.05
  Guest 1.4 (1.7) 1.8 (2.6) 1.9 (1.5) ns ns
  Conflict 4.3 (3.3) 1.8 (3.0) 2.0 (2.6) ns <.0005
  Engage 3.8 (2.1) 4.5 (2.2) 4.2 (2.0) ns ns
  Disengage 5.2 (2.3) 2.1 (1.6) 4.1 (2.2) <.0001 <.025
 SSRS
  Assertion 9.7 (2.8) 11.7 (2.8) 12.0 (3.5) ns <.0001
  Self control 9.8 (3.5) 12.0 (2.8) 11.8 (3.8) ns <.005
  Externalizing 4.5 (2.4) 3.8 (2.0) 3.8 (2.5) ns ns
  Internalizing 7.1 (1.6) 6.2 (1.7) 6.0 (2.5) ns <.025
Teacher measuresa
 PEI
  Withdrawal 4.2 (2.2) 3.5 (2.5) 3.6 (2.8) ns ns
  Aggression 1.5 (1.8) 1.3 (1.3) 1.6 (1.7) ns ns

an = 24