Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;94(8):566–573. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.165852

Table 1. Textual analysis of consultation submissions and WHO’s sugars intake guideline, 2015.

Document Total no. of words No. of unique words Raw Wordscoresa score (SE) Martin–Vanberg transformedb Wordscores score
Rescaled transformed Wordscores scorec
Value (SE) 95% CI
Consultation submissions from sugar industry-related organizations
World Sugar Research Organisation 2703 803 0.32 (0.01) 0.03 (0.02) −0.02 to 0.08 0.11
Food Industry Asia 1146 305 0.39 (0.01) 0.35 (0.04) 0.27 to 0.43 0.25
International Food & Beverage Alliance 709 241 0.37 (0.01) 0.29 (0.05) 0.19 to 0.39 0.23
Nestlé 524 222 0.27 (0.01) −0.23 (0.05) −0.32 to −0.13 0.00
Sugar Nutrition UK 2346 442 0.35 (0.01) 0.18 (0.03) 0.13 to 0.24 0.18
Kenniscentrum suiker & voeding 1958 331 0.36 (0.01) 0.22 (0.03) 0.16 to 0.27 0.19
Wirtschaftliche Vereinigung Zucker 2795 453 0.35 (0.00) 0.17 (0.02) 0.12 to 0.21 0.17
Consultation submissions from public health organizations
Centre for Science in the Public Interest 1400 331 0.32 (0.01) −0.01 (0.03) −0.07 to 0.06 0.10
United Kingdom Health Forum 2539 445 0.43 (0.01) 0.55 (0.03) 0.50 to 0.60 0.34
BEUCd 1468 337 0.37 (0.01) 0.24 (0.03) 0.17 to 0.31 0.21
International Baby Food Action Network 2430 456 0.34 (0.01) 0.12 (0.03) 0.07 to 0.18 0.15
El Poder del Consumidore 849 235 0.38 (0.01) 0.30 (0.04) 0.21 to 0.39 0.23
Wemosf 820 335 0.68 (0.01) 1.78 (0.04) 1.69 to 1.86 0.88
World Dental Federation 1969 391 0.35 (0.01) 0.14 (0.03) 0.08 to 0.20 0.16
World Obesity Federation 173 88 0.38 (0.02) 0.30 (0.10) 0.10 to 0.49 0.23
European Public Health Alliance 1088 515 0.73 (0.01) 2.04 (0.04) 1.97 to 2.12 1.00
WHO sugars intake guideline, 2015
Draft version 5643 537 0.38 (0.00) 0.34 (0.02) 0.30 to 0.37 0.25
Final version 6447 550 0.38 (0.00) 0.32 (0.02) 0.29 to 0.35 0.24

CI: confidence interval; SE: standard error; WHO: World Health Organization.

a The Wordscores program calculates scores for documents based on the scores of reference documents by assessing the frequency of words in the documents after words were replaced by their roots and stop words, numbers and symbols were removed.

b The Martin–Vanberg transformation compensates for the tendency for nondiscriminating words to pull scores towards the middle of the scale.

c The Wordscores scores obtained after the Martin–Vanberg transformation were rescaled such that the text from Nestlé had a score of 0 and that from the European Public Health Alliance had a score of 1.

d BEUC is an international European consumers organization.

e El Poder del Consumidor is a Mexican nongovernmental organization.

f Wemos is a Dutch nongovernmental organization.