Table 10.
Summary of recognition accuracy using our proposed method and the previous method (unit: %).
| Method | Using Single Visible Light Images | Using Single Thermal Images | Feature-Level Fusion | Score-Level Fusion | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EER | FAR | GAR | EER | FAR | GAR | EER | FAR | GAR | EER | FAR | GAR | |
| Previous Method [16] | 17.817 | 10.00 | 66.44 | 20.463 | 15.00 | 70.37 | 16.632 | 10.00 | 71.90 | 16.277 | 10.00 | 71.368 |
| 15.00 | 78.22 | 20.00 | 79.08 | 15.00 | 80.59 | 15.00 | 81.99 | |||||
| 17.820 | 82.186 | 20.480 | 79.554 | 16.660 | 83.396 | 16.280 | 83.726 | |||||
| 20.00 | 84.60 | 25.00 | 83.02 | 20.00 | 86.52 | 20.00 | 87.408 | |||||
| 25.00 | 88.22 | 30.00 | 86.56 | 25.00 | 90.00 | 25.00 | 92.21 | |||||
| Our Method | 15.219 | 10.00 | 74.52 | 18.257 | 10.00 | 68.40 | 14.819 | 5.00 | 62.08 | 13.060 | 5.00 | 70.79 |
| 15.00 | 84.04 | 15.00 | 77.09 | 10.00 | 77.56 | 10.00 | 82.88 | |||||
| 15.220 | 84.782 | 18.260 | 81.747 | 14.840 | 85.203 | 13.080 | 86.960 | |||||
| 20.00 | 88.96 | 20.00 | 84.08 | 15.00 | 85.52 | 15.00 | 88.88 | |||||
| 25.00 | 91.76 | 25.00 | 86.85 | 20.00 | 90.00 | 20.00 | 92.22 | |||||